In the article An Apple Tree Grows in Suburbia by Stephanie Simon of the Wall Street Journal, a new trend is revealed: mixing suburbia and agriculture. Simon writes that “In a movement propelled by environmental concern, nostalgia for a simpler life and a dollop of marketing savvy, developers are increasingly laying out their cul-de-sacs around organic farms, cattle ranches, vineyards and other agricultural ventures.”
Compare that comment with the words of the American Farmland Trust. On the topic of farmland loss, they report that “during the past 30 years, much of America’s most fertile farmland has been lost to wasteful development…more than 23 million acres of America’s agricultural land have been lost to development—an area the size of Indiana” (source: Farmland By the Numbers).
But what about the benefits of mixing suburban development with agriculture? Simon writes that a mother of two hopes to buy a suburban home in a community focused on agriculture, and says that she knows her “kids will know computers, technology—all those things they’re growing up with,” but she also wants them to know working with their hands in a farm setting. A new mix of suburban homes and farmland could also provide revenue for homeowners growing food on their property and selling what they grow, and provide jobs for farmers who help take care of agriculturally focused landscapes in suburban communities.
So is “agriburbia” the newest and coolest, or part of the problem? Take a moment to leave a comment and share your thoughts with the FoodHub community.